29 Jun No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson’s Kids Aren’t His.
Debbie Rowe & Michael Jackson Circa 1996. Photo: Dailymail.co.uk
Debbie Rowe spoke over the weekend that Michael Jackson’s kids are not his. She says it was a different sperm donor.
No crap. I think we all know that those kids were not biologically his. It does not change the fact that he was their father for the past 12 years, biological or not.
I don’t know why he felt the need to tell us they were his, but that is on him. She says this while announcing she has no plans of taking the kids away from the Jackson family.
Listen, I am not trying to defend him here. I just don’t care and have a feeling most of you don’t care either. He raised them. Who are we to play flippin’ Maurey Povich over here?
How do you guys feel about this being discussed by Debbie Rowe?-Dr.FB
tim
Posted at 15:33h, 03 NovemberI agree 100% Debbie Roe should not have waited until now to tell us something we
already knew.These kids are obviously white and anyone with eyes can see that
even if your color blind you can still see white or black.Michael himself even admitted
to being to afraid to have sex as the first girl who attempted ran him out of her house
so that also tells you that he probably didn’t know how to touch himself in a sexual manner in order to activate an erection to produce sperm samples.
meek
Posted at 15:15h, 18 Juneum lol debbie rowe was actually there when she herself got pregnant with the kids, why would she lie about something like this, after all her and michael are the only ones who know about the births and how she conceived prince and paris. so if debbie rowe, the mother of the kids finally wants to come out and say that the kids aren’t his biologically, then that’s okay, besides she doesn’t even want to take the children away from mike’s family now.debbie could have been told that the kids weren’t michael’s when she was married to him. of course michael would say they’re his, because he’s the one raising them.
super bowl 2010
Posted at 11:12h, 28 JanuaryMy brother would fall in love this website. We were not too long ago discussing about this. lol
AW
Posted at 02:31h, 20 JulyDebbie Rowe is so unbelievable. She took millions from MJ and now comes out with info NO ONE needs to hear. The kids are Michael’s, no matter what. The fact that she has the audacity to share any personal details is devious and malicious. She is so unloyal, how could she ever be anyone’s mother? All these people blabbing their mouths now should be ashamed of themselves. They are just pitiful opportunists. I hope the kids stay with the Jacksons.
Lillian
Posted at 03:10h, 10 JulyI dont care if they were his real children or not he was there father since the day they were born. My father, my real father, left when i was just a few months old, my step dad raised me from birth to me he is my real father, so why is this any different? Because hes micheal jackson? Theres a good reason he didnt tell anyone they werent his biological children.
And i wouldnt be suprised if this story is false. But as far as his child blanket goes, he looks alot like his daddy
lavish
Posted at 19:00h, 09 Julywell, in this happenning,whoever was looking after and take a good care of the kids, thats the parents,no matter what.And y MJ did this, is to share and show someone what had been missing in his childhoods life.So y someone like her would take that away from those lucky children of MJ?If this is for money?, it doesnt buy happiness,it will tears u apart.So Rowe,so sorry,it is too late,too bad and too sad.I think as long as the kids are happy where they live,that is the main thing we should think about,and as soon as they grown up,they know the way they have being teach by their loving father.As MJS father, if he wasnt tuff MJ wouldnt be known by the world,who knows? only God knows everything of our life.
elle
Posted at 15:39h, 09 JulyIt’s pretty obvious those aren’t his biological kids. They don’t look in any way the least bit biracial. Mariah Carey looks more biracial than those kids and she’s only 1/4 black if that.
My brother a light caramel colored man and fully black has a son who is biracial and came out with fair skin, curly blond hair and blue eyes. But you could still see the boy was biracial and he looks like a negative of my brother. Those kids look NOTHING like the Jacksons.
The Jackson genes are STRONG. All of them look alike. How does this not show up in the kids? But regardless, Michael was their Dad. Just not the biological father. Obviously.
Jessie
Posted at 01:01h, 08 JulyShe is lying out her teeth when the youngest was born there was a DNA test done on all 3 children. Yes they are his children he was the donor they did not have a sexual relationship Micheal wanted kids and she agreed to carry his children she signed a contract stating she would not contact or be in there lives. She is just trying to get in the lime light.
mail
Posted at 06:31h, 02 JulyI can only hope she told them in private before she announced that to the world, preferably while he was still alive. What a trip. What’s the point of even bringing that up?
N.A.Crawford
Posted at 13:26h, 01 JulyIt dont take biology to make someone a father; To me, he was. In the African American community in the past, when a child was without, someone would take them in and raise them. That happened to a lot of folk. So what he did was natural; talking about it now was tacky on Ms Rowe’s part especially knowing that young children is listening to all of this. As far as Katherine taking them, well, she is older, thats my only concern, but who knows, it could be a good thing.
JoEl E
Posted at 18:45h, 29 JuneI’m sayin as a mother, she has no business trying to make him look bad after his demise. she gave up any rights to those children and should NOT try to make him look bad. He raised those children as his own regardless of where (or who) they came from. She walked away from them! Why to slander the man those children call FATHER! Shame on you Debbie Rowe!
RIP Michael, we all LOVE you no matter what!
FutureGirl
Posted at 15:19h, 29 JuneHe did raise them and loved them as if they were his own and they loved him as their father.
As for Debbie’s comments, she was just telling the truth, that it was a sperm donor and not MJ’s. But I think that she is making the right decision to not take the kids away from the family, although I do think that she should still be a part of their life as their biological mother, especially if they may want or need that in their lives.
drfunkenberry
Posted at 14:52h, 29 JuneKristie, please find the story that you say I disrespected him.
Remember, I have other people writing on the site other then myself. It should say under the title who wrote it and everything I write is under drfb.
If you have the time to say I said that then you should have the time to find it.
Thank you.
Kristie
Posted at 14:22h, 29 JuneAnd, there are things about them that look like Michael. Like their ears, and Prince’s eyes. And, even if they aren’t biologically his, maybe he said that to avoid media scrutiny. Maybe he wanted to save those kids from some heartache. But, no one thinks about that stuff. No one, except the people that knew his heart, had the decency to remember he was a human being with real feelings. You seem like a pretty decent person, Doc. But I remember reading some stuff YOU have recently said about Michael that did not sit well with me. And, now that he’s dead, you try to show him some respect. Well, he is dead, people. Where was your empathy when he was ALIVE? He doesn’t care about what you guys think now. He is with God, and God’s opinion is all he cares about now. I knew Michael. I knew his heart. With everything in me, I can tell you that man made God PROUD. There aren’t many ppl I can say that about. Not many at all.
RIP MJJ
Posted at 13:42h, 29 JuneDuh!
fam
Posted at 13:18h, 29 JuneWhen I read the headline, I thought, “No shit.” However, he DID raise the kids for all these years even if he may not be the biological father.
mr.goodnight3121
Posted at 13:05h, 29 JuneI loved Michael but he was a walking contradiction. There was always lies and have truthss told about what was really going on in his life. That Debbie Rowe that is beyond tacky what she said. She seems one short trip away from the yellow bus. Those kids would not be better off with her anyway.
It is so sad what is happening in the aftermath of Michael s death and it is only going to get worse.
PFL
Posted at 12:55h, 29 JuneI knew they were not biologically his children but if he’s raised them since birth then, they are.
bluerose7
Posted at 11:54h, 29 JuneI also agree this is poor taste on Debbie’s part. I’m sure she made a promise to keep quiet about during MJ’s lifetime, but at the same time, for this information to be leaked publically surrounding his death was poor taste. He was their father technically because he loved and cared for them. It is also sad to know that there wasn’t a “major intervention” involving his drug addiction by family members and so-called close friends, like how Britney’s family took hold and demanded they take over her care to get her better. MJ’s death is a tragic loss and if it did in fact was due to dependency on drugs, it hurts to know harsher steps were not taken to intervene. May he rest in peace.
No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson’s Kids Aren’t His. | Celebrity :: AllNewsTopics
Posted at 11:33h, 29 June[…] View original here:No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson’s Kids Aren’t His. […]
L8yFingers607
Posted at 10:21h, 29 JuneBeyond Poor Timing and Bad Taste. The children have just learned their Father (biological or not) has died and now she tells the world (and them) that he wasn’t their father!!! WTF is wrong with her? By all accounts Michael was an attentive, loving and caring parent. No, Ms. Rowe, you got it wrong… Michael WAS their father. YOU are not a good mother.
Portia
Posted at 10:13h, 29 JuneI think that there are plenty of people in the MJ circle who are choosing to NOW come out with all of these revelations regarding Michael. NO ONE wanted to do a thing about his drug addiction when he was alive and I think that this is deplorable. The Jackson former lawyer….why speak out now?? HE’S DEAD! Debbie Rowe making her statement in the wake of his death is in poor poor taste. It lends nothing to the bottom line of these poor kids who have lost their father. The woman isn’t even vying for custody of them….so why put that news out there? Dispicable.
UTOPIA7
Posted at 10:12h, 29 JuneTasteless to discuss this now ! good thing she won’t seek custody because the children would ask why they were given up in the first place. Also
I think the children should either be with one of the sisters Janet maybe
the parents are too old to deal with a soon to be teenager as well as younger children.
justmemuchlove
Posted at 09:42h, 29 June“..How do you guys feel about this being discussed by Debbie Rowe?- ..”
———————————————————————————-
After all these years she just shouldnt have said anyhing. I mean.. WOMAN ..WE ALL KNOW! Like Doc said It doesnt matter.. Period.
Lovenharmony
Posted at 09:38h, 29 JuneI believe that stating they weren’t his biological children after the fact is inconsiderate and mean to the late MJ. Those were his children, biological or not. He raised them and loved them as his own so they were his in every sense of the word. In any case, anyone could see that they were not his biological children. Making such a statement now does not take away from him being the father.